[Jul 09, 2023] Get Latest and 100% Accurate 300-510 Exam Questions [Q52-Q72] : IT Certification Exam Braindumps : http://blog.braindumpsit.com

NO.52 Refer to the exhibit.

R1 is directly connected to R2 and R3. R1 is in BGP AS 123, R2 is in BGP AS 2, and R3 is in BGP AS 3. Assume that there is no connectivity issue between R1, R2 and R1, R3. Which result between BGP peers R1, R2 and R1, R3 is true?

The BGP session does not come up between R1 and R2 and between R1 and R3.

The BGP session comes up between R1 and R2 and between R1 and R3.

The BGP session comes up between R1 and R3, but not between R1 and R2.

The BGP session comes up between R1 and R2, but not between R1 and R3.

NO.53 Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer has successfully fixed BGP peering issue. R1 has an established eBGP peering with R2 and R3. Which mechanism should the engineer apply in order to steer the traffic correctly?

The MED attribute can be applied on R2 to influence R1 to use it as the primary path.

The local preference attribute can be applied on R3 to influence AS 65513 to use AS 65515 as the secondary path.

The weight attribute can be applied on R2 to influence AS 65513 to use AS 65515 as the primary path.

The IGP metric can be manipulated on R1 to allow traffic to be load balanced between R2 and R3.

NO.54 Refer to the exhibit.

Which task must you perform on interface g1/0/0 to complete the SSM implementation?

configure OSPFv3

enable CDP

disable IGMP

configure IGMPv3

NO.55 Which multicast routing protocol is most optimal for supporting many-to-many multicast applications?

PIM-SM

PIM-BIDIR

MP-BGP

DVMRP

MSDP

NO.56 Refer to the exhibit.

Router 1 is connected to router 2 on interface TenGigE0/1. Which interface provides the alternate path to 172.16.200.9/32 when the link between router 1 and router 2 goes down?

TenGigE0/1 interface provides the alternate path

A backup path must be statically installed

TenGigE0/2 interface provides the alternate path

A primary path must be manually installed

NO.57 Refer to the exhibit.

There is a connectivity issue between Customer-1 and Customer-2 File servers between the customers cannot send critical data R3 routes are missing from the routing table on the Customer-1 router All interlaces on Customer-1 are up Which configuration must be applied to router R2 to correct the problem?

Option A

Option B

Option C

Option D

NO.58 What is the purpose of a BGP confederation?

It limits the number of routes a device receives from its peers, which reduces CPU load.

It improves service by increasing the number of simultaneous iBGP peering sessions.

It redirects traffic away from route reflectors, which reduces their operating load.

It reduces the number of iBGP peers and increases stability.

NO.59 Refer to the exhibit.

Which attribute can router 1 alter so that only other iBGP peers prefer to use 192.168.4.2 as the next hop for route 192.168.3.0/24?

MED

local preference

origin

weight

NO.60 Refer to the exhibit.

P1 and PE3 Cisco IOS XR routers are directly connected and have this configuration applied. The BGP session is not coming up. Assume that there is no IP reachability problem and both routers can open tcp port 179 to each other. Which two actions fix the issue? (Choose two.)

Change MD5 to HMAC-SHA1-12

Change MD5 to HMAC-ESP

Change MD5 to SHA-1

Change MD5 to HMAC-MD5

Remove the send and accept lifetime under key 1

NO.61 Refer io the exhibit.

While applying the configurations on two routers an engineer notices that OSPF adjacency Between them remains down Through the ping test the engineer confirmed that both me routers have Layer 3 reachability between them Which action should me engineer take to make the adjacencies to full?

Enter the command ip ospf authentication in R2 interface

Enable OSPF just inside the router OSPF process not in the interfaces of any router

Delete the area 0 authentication message-digest command from the OSPF process in R1

Delete the area 0 authentication message-digest command from the OSPF process in R2

NO.62 Refer to the exhibit.

After troubleshooting an OSPF adjacency issue, routers 1, 2, and 3 have formed OSPF neighbor relationships. Which statement about the configuration is true?

Router 2 receives a Type 5 LSAs from router 1 for its connected subnets

Router 2 uses router 3 as the next hop for 192.168.0.0/24

Router 2 uses router 1 as the next hop for 192.168.0.0/24

Router 2 receives a Type 7 LSAs from router 3 for its connected subnets

NO.63 Refer to the exhibit

An engineer is configuring service traffic from router R1 to R6 as shown. Which additional configuration must the engineer implement so that the LDP and SR domains will participate and interwork with each other?

Router2(config)# segment-routing
Router2(config-sr)# ldp mapping-server
Router2(config-sr-ms)# prefix-sid-map
Router2(config-sr-ms-map)#
Router2(config-sr-ms-map-af)# 2.2.2.2/32 500 range 4

Router2(config)# segment-routing
Router2(config-sr)# sr mapping-server
Router2(config-sr-ms)# ldp-sid-map
Router2(config-sr-ms-map)# address-family ipv4
Router2(config-sr-ms-map-af)# 10.1.1.1/32 500 range 50

Router2(config)# segment-routing
Router2(config-sr)# mapping-server
Router2(config-sr-ms)# prefix-sid-map
Router2(config-sr-ms-map)# address-family ipv4
Router2(config-sr-ms-map-af)# 10.1.1.1/32 500 range 50

Router2(config)# segment-routing
Router2(config-sr)# ldp mapping-server
Router2(config-sr-ms)# prefix-sid-map
Router2(config-sr-ms-map)# address-family ipv4
Router2(config-sr-ms-map-af)# 2.2.2.2/32 500 range 40

NO.64 Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer has divided AS into confederations. Due to repeated ASN, when the 10.0 0.0/8 prefix from R1 arrives to R2, BGP automatically rejects it.
What should the engineer do to fix the problem so that BGP allows that prefix on R2?

Configure the command as-override on R1.

Configure the command allowas-in on R2.

Configure the command allowas-in on all the PE routers.

Configure the command as-override on R2.

NO.65 Refer to the exhibit.

A network operator must inject a Level 1 route from XR2 (10.16.16.0/24) into the ISIS topology. Which configuration allows the injection in a way that XR3 and XR1 have a valid and working route for 10.16.16.0/24?

Option A

Option B

Option C

Option D

NO.66 Refer to the exhibit.

While configuring router 2 with all the default values, a network engineer cannot see any route received in router 1. How should the engineer solve the issue?

Set up a priority different than 0 in the interface.

Modify the router ID to be the interface IP on the serial.

Modify the IP address or mask of the interface to a valid one.

Set the network type in S1/0 to point-to-point.

NO.67 Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer working for a private telecommunication company with an employee id 4115 46 881 is enabling a segment routing solution with these requirements.
A service provider is using the default range for prefix SID.
PE1 must allocate the first SID from the default range for the loopback address PE1 and PE2 loopback SID allocation should have a minimum difference of 500.
Which configuration must be implemented to meet the requirements?

Option A

Option B

Option C

Option D

NO.68 Refer to the exhibit.

Routers within the cluster are not receiving the desired prefixes. What must be done to fix the issue?

Clients in that cluster must have full mesh connectivity between eBGP peers.

No client-to-client must be disabled.

Clients in that cluster must have full mesh connectivity between iBGP peers.

No client-to-client reflection must be enabled.

NO.69 After an engineer configures BGP in R1, it starts receiving this message
*Jun 29 13:30:50.122: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 192.168.10.1 Down User reset Jun 29 13:30:52.341: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 192.168.10.1
2/6 (unacceptable hold time) 0 bytes
Which action makes the peering come back up again?

Make a soft reset to the peer.

Set up a minimum hold-down timer higher.

Set up a hello timer higher.

Set up a hold-down timer higher.

NO.70 Refer to the exhibit. R3 is:
* failing to accept multicast RP information from Domain-A
* advertising MSDP SA messages to R1 and R4
* receiving SA messages only from R4
Which command must the engineer implement to resolve the issue?

R3# ip msdp sa-filter in 192.168.3.1

R3# no ip msap sa-filter in 192.168.1.1

R3# no ip msdp peer 192.168.1.1

R3# ip msdp sa-filter out 192.168.1.1

NO.71 Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit Networks 172.16.31.0/24 and 172 16 30.0/24 are advertised in area 34. and network 172.22 10.0/24 is advertised in area 0. A recent security review discovered that users connected to routers R1 and R2 have been making unauthorized access to an application running on network 172 16 31 0/24 An engineer determined that routers R1 and R2 are receiving updates for network 17 16 31 0/24 Which action resolves the issue?

Apply route filtering on routers R3 and R4.

Apply route filtering on router R3 only.

Apply route filtering on routers RI and R2

Apply route filtering on router R4 only.

NO.72 Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Company A established BGP sessions with several ISPs. A network engineer at the company must filter out all traffic except for routes that transit AS 152. The engineer configured the filtering policy “permit _152S_(_[0.9])” on R1, but after applying the configuration, the engineer notices that other routes are still visible. Which action resolves the issue?

Option A

Option B

Option C

Option D